Qodo
Agentic code review for pull requests, IDE workflows, and changes that span connected repositories.
About Qodo
Qodo is an AI code review platform for engineering teams that want consistent standards across pull requests, IDE workflows, and large codebases. It reads codebase context, repository rules, and agentic review workflows to find issues before merge. Teams can connect Git and IDE tools, manage reusable review skills, and inspect dashboards and analytics. Cross-repository review follows a change into related repositories, including repositories hosted by different Git providers. Pro Team costs $30 per month, includes unlimited reviews, and lets teams choose credit packs. Enterprise uses custom pricing for organizations that need governance controls, advanced self-learning, their own model keys, single-tenant SaaS, or on-premises deployment. Pro Team has a 14-day trial, which is separate from a permanent free plan.
Best for
Best use cases
Review pull requests with codebase context before merge
Detect breaking changes across related repositories
Enforce repository skills and monitor rule coverage
Compare before choosing
Pro Team has a fixed $30 monthly price; Enterprise requires a quote
Pro Team includes standard support; Enterprise adds priority support and a dedicated CSM
Enterprise adds SSO, audit logs, advanced self-learning, and deployment choices
Features
Agentic pull request review
Use Qodo when a team wants automated review before merge without moving developers into a separate review tool. It reads the pull request in the context of the wider codebase and repository rules, surfaces findings in the Git workflow, and supports pre-PR review skills. This fits teams that want repeatable checks while keeping human reviewers responsible for the final decision.
Cross-repository impact checks
Use cross-repository review for shared libraries, APIs, and schemas whose changes can break dependent services outside the current repository. Qodo identifies connected repositories, traces impact in both directions, and links a conflict finding to affected lines. Repository relationships can span Git providers, which helps organizations whose services are split across platforms.
Review standards management
Store coding standards, architectural decisions, ownership guidance, or workflow checklists in repository skill files. Qodo selects relevant skills during pull request review and cites the skill behind a finding. Administrators can use the portal to check standards coverage, inspect rule activity, and find repositories where enforcement is missing or inconsistent.
Pros
- Unlimited reviews on the $30 monthly Pro Team plan reduce per-review cost uncertainty
- Git and IDE integrations keep review findings inside existing development workflows
- Cross-repository analysis can expose breaking changes that a single-repository review would miss
Cons
- Pro Team usage depends on credit packs, so teams must choose capacity and manage possible overage
- Advanced self-learning, SSO, audit logs, and flexible deployment require the custom-priced Enterprise plan
- Cross-repository review and centralized skills management are marked beta, which may affect rollout expectations
Pricing Plans
Pro Team
- Unlimited reviews
- Credit packs starting at 2,500 credits
- Agentic PR code review
- Unlimited rules system
- Git and IDE integrations
- Pre-PR review skills
- Dashboard and analytics
- Strict data retention
Enterprise
- Everything in Pro Team
- SSO, SAML, and audit logs
- Governance analytics dashboard
- Advanced self-learning
- Bring your own LLM keys
- Single-tenant SaaS or on-premises deployment
- Priority support and dedicated customer success manager
* Pricing information is for reference only. Please refer to the latest announcement on Qodo's official website.